Subject: now youve got qed i celebrate
Date: Jul 08, 2003 @ 18:17
Author: acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


another golden oldie too

--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "acroorca2002"
<orc@o...> wrote:
> ahh
> okay lowell
> i may have just glimpsed your meaning
> & certainly a beautiful idea
>
> what if the suspension of the normal laws of reality had
actually
> been codified by delineating the bridge construction itself in its
> entirety as a special 3dimensional proruption both from the
> normal thalweg boundary & from normal reality itself
>
> & it couldve been done at least that cleanly in some treaty text
> so we are not completely out of the woods here yet
> in our diligence
> before proceeding to stage the wetback incident

> but anyway to return to the first beautiful idea
> whether the same as your idea or not
> what the suspension of vertical integrity in favor of bridge
integrity
> would have the great virtue of producing at every level from the
> ground to the top of the bridge is the most complex cross
> sections of unimaginably diverse international claves &
perhaps
> counterclaves etc
> depending only on the particular physical form of each bridge
>
> but since the legal delineation of this new regime could be
done
> with so few & such easy strokes of a pen
> we must consider it if not a present possibility here then at
least
> a likely eventuality somewhere
>
> & thus we have built or at least imagined a simple model by
> which such an exceptional reality as vertically differentiated
> sovereignty could come into existence if indeed it hasnt already
> emerged
>
> for lets remember there is still a probability in which peters
> similarly simplistic idea of a variable hinge boundary or some
> other easy formula like or unlike that one or this one already
> exists de jure
>
> yet still i have a feeling that if we are going to find or create a
> situation that suspends the laws of normal reality
> we still have a ways to go
> however ready for prime time the wetback caper may be
>
> for of course these 2 are completely separate ideas & tries
> however excellent as a pair of associate yaks
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "acroorca2002"
> <orc@o...> wrote:
> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Lowell G.
McManus"
> > <mcmanus71496@m...> wrote:
> > > Acroorca wrote:
> > >
> > > > aha