Subject: Re: as postulated or qed
Date: Jul 03, 2003 @ 18:19
Author: acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> That happened before my happy arrival in the group. Ioriginally shared the
> bridge photos only to document an thought-provokingmonumentation. I was never
> trying to prove a vertical differentiation. It was my theory allalong that the
> dry land under the Mexican portion of the bridge on the northernside of the Rio
> Grande was an extension of Mexico. I just wasn't as certain asI am now.
>hopes
> Lowell G. McManus
> Leesville, Louisiana, USA
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "acroorca2002" <orc@o...>
> To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:28 PM
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] as postulated or qed
>
>
> which you may recall was also where we began
> still wanting after witnessing many busted tries claims &
> to see hard evidence anywhere in the world today
> delimiting any break whatsoever
> in the vertical continuity of sovereign territory & space