Subject: Re: as postulated or qed
Date: Jul 03, 2003 @ 18:19
Author: acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


ah so lowell of course
& all i meant you may recall
in your & our particular case where you & we began was
10750 10751 10752 10755 etc
tho i must say i have grown happier & wiser too since 10755

--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Lowell G. McManus"
<mcmanus71496@m...> wrote:
> That happened before my happy arrival in the group. I
originally shared the
> bridge photos only to document an thought-provoking
monumentation. I was never
> trying to prove a vertical differentiation. It was my theory all
along that the
> dry land under the Mexican portion of the bridge on the northern
side of the Rio
> Grande was an extension of Mexico. I just wasn't as certain as
I am now.
>
> Lowell G. McManus
> Leesville, Louisiana, USA
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "acroorca2002" <orc@o...>
> To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:28 PM
> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] as postulated or qed
>
>
> which you may recall was also where we began
> still wanting after witnessing many busted tries claims &
hopes
> to see hard evidence anywhere in the world today
> delimiting any break whatsoever
> in the vertical continuity of sovereign territory & space