Subject: Re: more pics<br/>
Date: Jun 14, 2003 @ 15:08<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="10529.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="11701.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic10529.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="10536.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="10538.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-443770838"><blockquote><span title="ireply">&gt;<br/>
&gt; Hope you enjoy these. I&#39;ll send some more later.<br/>
&gt; Dallen<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>bravo & of course we enjoyed them<br/>
& just in case you were waiting for comment before continuing<br/>
let me continue applauding<br/>
for you have already shown us 3 or 4 sure border monuments<br/>
where we had only noticed 1 before<br/>
& you have offered a comprehensive & fairly compelling theory of <br/>
full demarcation by low stone dry walls<br/>
tho the locations of the pavement changes & signage do jostle it <br/>
a bit<br/>
especially in view of the second pic in your first batch<br/>
which shows a very wavy stone wall snaking its way along a <br/>
stretch that is marked on all the maps by a very straight line<br/>
<br/>
so lets at least store such loose ends in the back of our mind <br/>
til we can find & check the treaty or authoritative map<br/>
even as we continue to luxuriate in the presentation</div>