Subject: Fwd: testing &hotdang another multimessage
Date: Aug 10, 2001 @ 08:00
Author: Michael Donner ("Michael Donner" <barbaria_longa@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
>From: "m donner" >To: boundarypoint@egroups.com >CC: barbaria_longa@... >Subject: testing &hotdang another multimessage >Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 00:57:52 +0000 > >andrew & all >please forgive me for the difficulties i have unwittingly been >causing you > >evidently they are owing mainly to my wanderings >but are vastly complicated by the vagaries of our new egroups >management company > microsoft or yahoo or somebody >which valiantly resist my reentry to normal membership > >so i trust you will understand >as i am now still in the process of correcting all this > >to date i have gone so far as to create another new identity >maxivan82 >of which this is a partial test >so please let me know if anything is any better > >but it looks like i may need bills help again here > > > >& bill >thank you very much indeed for the kind words >which came at the perfect moment >for i do still wish to fulfill what cummings only began > >you can see too with a quick altavista browse that he did pretty >much fully succeed in dropping his caps >but in most cases his points have continued to stick to him > >now i dont know whether he even meant to drop all such spots as >these >but i am endeavoring to do just that > either emulating him or without him > for i am not sure which >because i believe the spots limit & clutter my thinking > > > >& peter >i congratulate & emulate you for sticking with the cockabebble >notational process >because i think it is valuable for many reasons >not the least of which is to be able to speak more & more easily & >enjoyably together about all these punctological & linealogical & >arealogical realities > >indeed i would only wish to continually advance & refine all this >because it has already advanced & enhanced the list enormously > > > >& brian >what >do you mean the 2 of you only had one old mule of a moose for the 2 >of you >you really shouldve stopped at my house > >but seriously >nice work on starting that mnndsd cairn >which i will add to at least mentally now > >i dont trust the usgs topo >but i figure it places the tripoint about 80 feet east of the >witness monument >& thus about 55 feet west of your cairn > >it seems to suggest that both the mnnd & the mnsd boundaries have >changed with some natural as well as with some manmade changes in >the river >but my questioning usgs about this has been fruitless >as has my search for legal documentation of any changes > >therefore i continue to think it likely that jack is still correct >in following bus&ss & the statement on the witness monument >which all say go 9 chains east young man >but i would add dont try that until the ground & river have frozen > >however if we are all still correct in this belief >it means your cairn is 459 feet too far west > > >also i applaud your extreme courage & whimsy again & again for >representing dry pan as true pan >dry ohn as true ohn >etc etc >etc etc >especially here where we are so extremist about getting to the >truest available truth > >you seem to be suggesting in this & i would agree that all the cards >are just unwild jokers when compared to the multipoints >except i would add perhaps i could still get excited about a >complete perfect news tour meld > >btw >it appears you guys are now the top crows of caus >with your only potential competition locked up in taiwan > >& you may also very well have become top dogs of charter expense >since the old record spent on a single taxi ride is believed to have >been only 308 americanski > > > >now david & jesper & anyone else still tuned to atchde >i appreciate your approaching gideon on this >& would like to scratch my remaining itches here in the meantime > >first >what is the source of the 25m isobath limit of all 3 national >sovereignties > >second >is everything deeper than 25m trisovereign or nonsovereign or what > >third >are there any isolated shallows of less than 25m within the >generally deeper interior reaches of the lake >& if so do they produce claves >& if so are such claves allocated according to the equidistance >lines > >fourth >isnt equidistance in any case the primary or default regime & >bathymetry only a secondary delineation within that >& wouldnt gideon therefore also be correct to at least hypothesize a >tripoint on this basis > >fifth >could the zoomables & encyclopedia britannica also be wrong about >this tripoint > > > > >& finally grant >out there on the leading edge of everyones land > >i wonder if you are also considering adding the places where >continental shelf sovereign rights claims exceed the 200nm eezs & >might to that extent further diminish the common wealth of everyones >land >if not actually its sovereign territory > >also wondering whether the normally 12nm sovereign territorial >limits can be added to these existing maps >so that the full ebb & flow of our domains can be seen at a glance > > >& as mentioned >i think we may need to add a special extra salient or proruption >onto the coast here at yachats > >the name evidently originally meant > where the ocean comes to the river >& a deep embayment & estuary makes it still seem true >so this would be a very appropriate place for our landing even if >what i have been saying about it werent true > >but of course we are also standing by expectantly now at lake >constance for the possible announcement of a nonsovereign zone in >the middle of the lake there > >& we could conceivably emerge in strength from it as early as next >month >say in a wild eyed scenario if the bp amphibious unit aka gcebe >were there on the spot to play everyonese creature from the deep >& stake our first continental claim outside antarctica right in the >heart of europe > > >& for the millennium please see >http://www.mohawk.net/~barbaria/millennium.html > >m >