Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] capital city info for Peter
Date: Jun 13, 2001 @ 01:24
Author: Brendan Whyte ("Brendan Whyte" <brwhyte@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
>From: michaelstride@..._________________________________________________________________________
>Reply-To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
>To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [BoundaryPoint] capital city info for Peter
>Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:51:48 -0000
>
>Well, I checked my databases for legislation that defines London, or
>indeed the City of Westminster as the 'Capital' and drew a blank (Im
>a lawyer). As I'm sure your aware we don't actually have a written
>constitution. Arnt we the lucky ones! We do have definitions of what
>a city is, but not in a'legal' sense, which generally is a place with
>an Anglican Cathedral, but nowadays the government can confer city
>status on conurbations of an undefined size, undefined facilities,
>and undefined qualities.(Typical) Recently a number of cities applied
>and if my memory serves me, Brighton and possibly Wolverhampton
>became cities in the eyes of the government. I do know that Luton and
>Milton Keynes applied and failed.
>As for legal definitions of London as a Capital City, i'll search a
>little more. Its interesting the Hague is not a Capital, cos I always
>thought it was. You live and learn. Michael
>