- NL-enclave in Canada!
Thanks Jesper, for your excellent link on the US-CA border, message # 8963. It s a comprehensive link that covers many aspects of this great boundary...
Feb 11, 2003 @ 08:01 - Peter Hering (Peter Hering <hering@...>)
- Re: NL-enclave in Canada!
Peter Hering wrote: (...)a Dutch enclave - just a room in a hospital - read the story!: www.craigmarlatt.com/craig/canada/provinces&territories/netherlands.ht
Feb 11, 2003 @ 09:42 - Peter Smaardijk <smaardijk@yahoo.com> ("Peter Smaardijk <smaardijk@...>" <smaardijk@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: NL-enclave in Canada!
if it was a room on any floor above the ground, it would be an unique enclave, how would you experts classify that? Surround on all sides and underneath!!!!!
Feb 11, 2003 @ 09:58 - Bill Burke ("Bill Burke" <bill@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: NL-enclave in Canada!
And where is the border? Inside walls, outside walls, or probably not defined? Jesper ... From: Bill Burke To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday,
Feb 11, 2003 @ 10:15 - Jesper Nielsen ("Jesper Nielsen" <jesniel@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: NL-enclave in Canada!
Could this be called a GOLDFISH BOWL ENCAVE??????? ... From: Jesper Nielsen [mailto:jesniel@image.dk] Sent: 11 February 2003 10:15 To:
Feb 11, 2003 @ 10:20 - Bill Burke ("Bill Burke" <bill@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: NL-enclave in Canada!
This sounds like a temporary transfer of territory for a period of 1 day (?). I don t feel that this sounds so sensationally as I think I somewhere have heard
Feb 12, 2003 @ 10:23 - Jan S. Krogh ("Jan S. Krogh" <jan.krogh@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: NL-enclave in Canada!
This link is giving slightly another view on this topic: http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen_Juliana_of_the_Netherlands This page states that the parliament
Feb 12, 2003 @ 10:47 - Jan S. Krogh ("Jan S. Krogh" <jan.krogh@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] NL-enclave in Canada!
Jan, ... I discovered my Dutch boss is familiar with this story and he seems to remember the whole hospital was declared part of the Netherlands. The reason
Feb 12, 2003 @ 11:06 - Kevin Meynell (Kevin Meynell <kevin@...>)
- Re: NL-enclave in Canada!
Aren t you mixing terms up in your comments? I don t think what we have here is a transfer of territory, but a transfer of sovereignty over a piece of
Feb 14, 2003 @ 23:41 - L. A. Nadybal <lnadybal@comcast.net> ("L. A. Nadybal <lnadybal@...>" <lnadybal@...>)
- Re: NL-enclave in Canada!
... Not really. Hauptstadt / Capital is a political function which has to be declared somehow (e.g. by law), even though nobody seems to be able to define it
Feb 15, 2003 @ 12:27 - anorak222 <listen@wschwanke.de> ("anorak222 <listen@...>" <listen@...>)
- Re: [BoundaryPoint] NL-enclave in Canada!
... Both the capital and seat of government is Canberra, although it s certainly not the biggest city or financial centre of Australia. However, that applies
Feb 15, 2003 @ 14:37 - Kevin Meynell (Kevin Meynell <kevin@...>)
- Re: NL-enclave in Canada! -> Amsterdam
... wrote ... (...)In 1990, reunification was achieved, and since that time Berlin was capital by law. The seat of government still remained
Feb 15, 2003 @ 18:43 - Peter Smaardijk <smaardijk@yahoo.com> ("Peter Smaardijk <smaardijk@...>" <smaardijk@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: NL-enclave in Canada!
Len, Maybe it seems that I am mixing the terms. What I wanted to show is that we concerning the NL enclave in CA probably not are speaking about a real
Feb 16, 2003 @ 19:30 - Jan S. Krogh ("Jan S. Krogh" <jan.krogh@...>)