Subject: Re: NL-enclave in Canada! -> Amsterdam
Date: Feb 15, 2003 @ 18:43
Author: Peter Smaardijk <smaardijk@yahoo.com> ("Peter Smaardijk <smaardijk@...>" <smaardijk@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "anorak222 <listen@w...>"
<listen@w...> wrote
>
(...)In 1990, reunification was achieved, and since that time Berlin
was "capital" by law. The seat of government still remained in Bonn.
Only in 1998 did they move to Berlin.
>
> A similar example, where this distinction has been permanent for I-
don't-know-how-long, is Holland. "Capital" is Amsterdam (seat of the
Queen, but not much else), but "seat of government" (where all the
real politics take place) is Den Haag. And I believe Australia is
similar.
>



True, except for the fact that the Queen doesn't live in Amsterdam.
She lives in The Hague. But this has been different for the last
three queens (Wilhelmina - Apeldoorn, Juliana - Soestdijk (the part
of that village in Baarn municipality), Beatrix - The Hague). So that
doesn't play a part in it.

No, Amsterdam is just capital by law (the constitution - so that
should be since the first constitution we had. That was in 1814). And
not really explicitely either, but as the place where every new king
or queen will be coronated, and therefore called the capital. But all
the "real politics", as you have pointed out, is happening in The
Hague, and this has a very long tradition indeed.

See http://www.bmz.amsterdam.nl/adam/uk/intro/gesch4.html , "The
Capital of Amsterdam".

Peter S.

PS By Holland you mean the Netherlands of course. Note that Amsterdam
isn't a provincial capital: the capital of the province of North
Holland, the one in which Amsterdam is situated, is Haarlem.