1. Old bedelu
    Two pictures of the old bedelu. One old stone is standing south of the road (B on the little scheme I made). It bears an inscription, but has become impossible
    May 10, 2002 @ 18:41 - Peter Smaardijk (Peter Smaardijk <smaardijk@yahoo.com>)
  2. Re: Old bedelu
    A site that makes things a bit more clear (although not entirely yet): http://home.tiscalinet.be/albertbastings/page19.html ... The boundary markers of
    May 10, 2002 @ 21:11 - ps1966nl ("ps1966nl" <smaardijk@...>)
  3. Re: Old bedelu
    ... is the true paleobedelu & that modern belu does indeed cross the road between markers b & a as i believe you said or meant to say yourself if more
    May 12, 2002 @ 02:46 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  4. Re: Old bedelu
    acroorca2002 wrote: (Peter S.: (...)The other marker (B) (...) here peter i assume you must mean marker a rather than marker b in case anyone is still
    May 12, 2002 @ 12:32 - ps1966nl ("ps1966nl" <smaardijk@...>)
  5. Re: Old bedelu
    thanx peter this is awesome ghostplay the only part i still dont get is your deduction that the belgian interprovincial boundary must run eastward from marker
    May 12, 2002 @ 15:16 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
  6. Re: Old bedelu
    oops now i have returned to your original diagram & of course no oblique line is needed since belu & lilu are clearly separated there & indeed are already at
    May 12, 2002 @ 19:52 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)