1. clavoscopy of everyones land advances
    well grant what could be finer & truer than a golf course on the boundary point of having 18 &or 19 cups now that takes care very roughly speaking of our
    Aug 15, 2001 @ 21:21 - m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)
  2. Re: clavoscopy of everyones land advances
    ... course or ... You ll remember we got into an unresolved debate about the precise maritime claims of the French in the Southern and Antarctic Lands. For the
    Aug 15, 2001 @ 22:07 - Grant Hutchison ("Grant Hutchison" <granthutchison@...>)
  3. RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: clavoscopy of everyones land advances
    Grant, Thanks for the list. But what about Peter I Isl. (Norway)? Jan
    Aug 16, 2001 @ 08:17 - Jan Krogh ("Jan Krogh" <jakro64@...>)
  4. Re: clavoscopy of everyones land advances
    Just remember that Norway may claim Peter I Isl. as a biland (+/- possession), but that it is well inside the Antarctic Treaty area, and therefore no
    Aug 16, 2001 @ 17:06 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
  5. Re: clavoscopy of everyones land advances
    ... Peter I Island lies south of 60S, and so comes under the terms of the Antarctic Treaty: we re therefore thinking of it as part of Everyone s Land. If we
    Aug 16, 2001 @ 17:14 - Grant Hutchison ("Grant Hutchison" <granthutchison@...>)
  6. RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: clavoscopy of everyones land advances
    Thanks Grant and Peter for clearing this up! Regards, Jan
    Aug 16, 2001 @ 17:28 - Jan Krogh ("Jan Krogh" <jakro64@...>)
  7. Re: clavoscopy of everyones land advances
    in 3645 jan said to grant & grant said to jan ... i have been wondering about all this it seems to me the antarctic treaty in 1959 actually neutralized or
    Dec 02, 2001 @ 08:29 - orc@orcoast.com (orc@...)
  8. Re: clavoscopy of everyones land advances
    in 3645 jan said to grant & grant said to jan ... i have been wondering about all this it seems to me the antarctic treaty in 1959 actually neutralized or
    Dec 02, 2001 @ 08:29 - orc@orcoast.com (orc@...)
  9. Re: clavoscopy of everyones land advances
    ... least one place in the world where the antarctic & maritime regimes are in conflict so it will make at least a good research & test case & this is an
    Dec 02, 2001 @ 15:13 - Grant Hutchison ("Grant Hutchison" <granthutchison@...>)
  10. Re: clavoscopy of everyones land advances
    ... it or they are on the most recent 6 cia maps of antarctica at perry castaneda & could easily be a dead fly on the master map which no one has noticed or
    Dec 03, 2001 @ 07:46 - orc@orcoast.com (orc@...)
  11. Re: clavoscopy of everyones land advances
    orc@o... wrote: Grant Hutchison wrote: (...) Macy and Swain and the Auroras. but that is even more interesting (...) At
    Dec 03, 2001 @ 17:13 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
  12. Re: clavoscopy of everyones land advances
    right i agree eezs arent an issue south of s60 except if grant & veridian are correct in projecting them down into there from the south sandwiches or other
    Dec 04, 2001 @ 05:33 - orc@orcoast.com (orc@...)
  13. Re: clavoscopy of everyones land advances
    ... A biland is a dependency. Look at http://www.ssb.no/emner/00/00/20/nos_c513/nos_c513.pdf . I know that you have trouble reading PDF files, and the
    Dec 04, 2001 @ 17:40 - Peter Smaardijk ("Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@...>)
  14. Re: clavoscopy of everyones land advances
    ... Ah, I see what you mean. It looks like a cartographer with a tic has attempted to insert the Diego Ramirez islands, just a tad too far south and a tad too
    Dec 04, 2001 @ 22:21 - Grant Hutchison ("Grant Hutchison" <granthutchison@...>)
  15. Re: clavoscopy of everyones land advances
    ... Ah, I see what you mean. It looks like a cartographer with a tic has attempted to insert the Diego Ramirez islands, just a tad too far south and a tad too
    Dec 04, 2001 @ 22:22 - Grant Hutchison ("Grant Hutchison" <granthutchison@...>)
  16. Re: clavoscopy of everyones land advances
    ... One amazing (if true) claim on that web page is that the Kerguelen Islands were possibly sighted in 1410 . If so, then by who?? This would be decades
    Dec 05, 2001 @ 03:24 - Ross Finlayson (Ross Finlayson <finlayson@...>)