1. MNNDSD Carefully
    Today I made some high-resolution scans of the Boisberg, MN topo map and scale so I could accurately measure the relationships between the witness monument and
    Aug 13, 2001 @ 20:22 - bjbutler@bjbsoftware.com (bjbutler@...)
  2. Re: [BoundaryPoint] MNNDSD Carefully
    Remember that due to the possible errors in drafting and printing, USGS maps only claim that things are within 1/50 inch of their true positions on the map,
    Aug 26, 2001 @ 02:45 - David Mark (David Mark <dmark@...>)
  3. Re: MNNDSD Carefully
    Thanks for the reminder. I was aware of this limitation, but even taking it into consideration the tri-point still would fall within the Bois de Sioux. That
    Aug 26, 2001 @ 17:11 - bjbutler@bjbsoftware.com (bjbutler@...)
  4. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: MNNDSD Carefully
    As you probably know, the definitive answers (I think) regarding US state boundaries can be found in Franklin K. Van Zandt s Boundaries of the United States
    Aug 26, 2001 @ 18:31 - David Mark (David Mark <dmark@...>)
  5. Re: MNNDSD Carefully
    I have that book and consulted it regarding this issue. It states what we already know - that the witness monument is 9 chains west of the Bois de Sioux
    Aug 27, 2001 @ 02:56 - bjbutler@bjbsoftware.com (bjbutler@...)
  6. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: MNNDSD Carefully
    david how is it probable anyone knows what you think m well ok now it is ... _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE
    Aug 27, 2001 @ 21:36 - m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)
  7. Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: MNNDSD Carefully
    yes now we are talking some leading edge punctology here so to repeat & elaborate the usgs was completely embarrassed by & indeed clueless about settling this
    Aug 27, 2001 @ 21:35 - m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)