1. mx2cmqryu dispute flares again but crazier than ever
    fresh news report http://www2.eluniversal.com.mx/pls/impreso/web_columnas_sup.detalle?var=29246 dispute was previously discussed tho the tripoint was misnamed
    Mar 06, 2006 @ 14:55 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
  2. Re: [BoundaryPoint] mx2cmqryu dispute flares again but crazier than ever
    Thanks for this juicy morsel of news on one of the most complex and baffling boundary situations in North America! I have reviewed your and my old posts on
    Mar 06, 2006 @ 18:57 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <lgm@...>)
  3. Re: [BoundaryPoint] mx2cmqryu dispute flares again but crazier than ever
    thanx & glad you dig it too but tho your maps arent working for me i dont find the mention of garbutts falls you saw there so surprising this map shows
    Mar 06, 2006 @ 21:12 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
  4. Re: [BoundaryPoint] mx2cmqryu dispute flares again but crazier than ever
    The article from EL UNIVERSAL on this state boundary dispute told us that the Mexican Constitution had been amended in December to provide that such disputes
    Mar 07, 2006 @ 04:55 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <lgm@...>)
  5. Re: [BoundaryPoint] mx2cmqryu dispute flares again but crazier than ever
    In addition to the state boundary disputes in the Yucatán Peninsula, the EL UNIVERSAL article also mentioned existing boundary disputes: (1) between the
    Mar 08, 2006 @ 18:52 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <lgm@...>)
  6. Re: [BoundaryPoint] mx2cmqryu dispute flares again but crazier than ever
    funny as described here only the zacatecas disputes stand a chance of involving another multipoint like cmqryu namely dunaza or janaza i believe if any but i
    Mar 08, 2006 @ 19:43 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
  7. Re: [BoundaryPoint] mx2cmqryu dispute flares again but crazier than ever
    But Ingeniero, the Nayarit-Zacatecas state line is so vanishingly short in any case (...indeed I can t find it anywhere) that the likelihood must actually be
    Mar 08, 2006 @ 20:29 - jim van dura (jim van dura <jimvandura@...>)
  8. Re: [BoundaryPoint] mx2cmqryu dispute flares again but crazier than ever
    ahh subcomandante right you are as ever encarta which is the best i can do shows naza to be only about 5 km long & all in what looks like a single geodetic
    Mar 08, 2006 @ 20:54 - aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
  9. Re: [BoundaryPoint] mx2cmqryu dispute flares again but crazier than ever
    I agree. I have maps that show the length of the Nayarit-Zacatecas boundary as short as one apparent quadripoint meeting of geodesics with Durango and Jalisco
    Mar 08, 2006 @ 22:15 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <lgm@...>)