1. high points
    ... But Australia s is on a tiny island in the Southern Ocean... It is a little known fact that the highest point on Australian Territory is actually Mawson s
    Jan 21, 2005 @ 01:11 - Brendan Whyte (Brendan Whyte <bwhyte@...>)
  2. RE: [BoundaryPoint] high points
    Hi. I think the distinction I was making was that when someone says What s the highest point in Germany? they mean right there in the country. I wouldn t
    Jan 21, 2005 @ 01:33 - Flynn, Kevin ("Flynn, Kevin" <flynnk@...>)
  3. high points
    But would you discount the northern Territory and the Australian Capital territory because they are territories like the Heard and MacDonald Island Territory
    Jan 21, 2005 @ 03:03 - Brendan Whyte (Brendan Whyte <bwhyte@...>)
  4. RE: [BoundaryPoint] high points
    ... Obviously not; they are political subdivisions that are *on* the Australian continent. Heald isn t. It s a tiny island thousands of miles away from
    Jan 21, 2005 @ 04:08 - Flynn, Kevin ("Flynn, Kevin" <flynnk@...>)
  5. Re: high points
    But that view couldn t be held consistently. For instance, lets assume for a moment that the highest point in France was on Guadeloupe. That would only apply
    Jan 21, 2005 @ 04:19 - L. A. Nadybal ("L. A. Nadybal" <lnadybal@...>)
  6. RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: high points
    Your outline makes my point of view entirely consistent, rather than inconsistent. If Guadeloupe is corporately a fully participant entity in the nation-state,
    Jan 21, 2005 @ 17:53 - Flynn, Kevin ("Flynn, Kevin" <flynnk@...>)