1. The tree that ate ARLATX
    Back in message 11281, I promised a reconnaissance of the ARLATX state tripoint in the fall, and Mike suggested in message 11289 that I use square, level, and
    Oct 28, 2003 @ 17:49 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@msn.com>)
  2. Re: [BoundaryPoint] The tree that ate ARLATX
    ... How old is the marker? -- Anton Sherwood, http://www.ogre.nu/
    Oct 28, 2003 @ 19:22 - Anton Sherwood (Anton Sherwood <bronto@...>)
  3. Re: [BoundaryPoint] The tree that ate ARLATX
    The USC&GS brass disc stamped 1930 is set in the top of the older limestone monument, which both Parsell and Van Zandt say was set in 1895. Van Zandt says
    Oct 29, 2003 @ 00:54 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  4. RE: [BoundaryPoint] The tree that ate ARLATX
    For the benefit of those who haven t seen this monument before the root started shoving it, the attached photo shows the late Clark Hall on June 21, 1991 when
    Oct 29, 2003 @ 04:42 - jparsell ("jparsell" <jparsell@northnet.org>)
  5. Re: [BoundaryPoint] The tree that ate ARLATX
    ... large ... Now, with the information from Van Zandt that the monument is 48 inches long and my measurement of a six-degree tilt, I can calculate that the
    Oct 29, 2003 @ 06:13 - Lowell G. McManus ("Lowell G. McManus" <mcmanus71496@...>)
  6. Re: The tree that ate ARLATX
    thanx & nicely done lowell & i would just like to add or reiterate the data & considerations in messages 11300 & 11303 & to congratulate you for showing a
    Oct 29, 2003 @ 16:08 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)