- RE: [BoundaryPoint] new njny
Responding here to your inquiry over in the other thread (btw, I didn t say I would actually walk OK-TX! I merely meant it could be done and in all likelihood,
May 09, 2003 @ 22:54 - Flynn, Kevin ("Flynn, Kevin" <flynnk@...>)
- Re: new njny
... didn t say ... and in all ... hahahahahahhh hahaha in your dreams baby hahahaha & i am still trying to understand the rest of your unclarity here below &
May 09, 2003 @ 22:51 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: new njny
Simply.... The Compact delineates two separate rights... ownership of *and* jurisdiction over. They mean two different things, and this to me implies heavily
May 09, 2003 @ 23:14 - Flynn, Kevin ("Flynn, Kevin" <flynnk@...>)
- Re: new njny
... *and* ... implies ... the Hudson ... NJ, are ... Guantanamo ... ahh ok very good & there is other stuff in the compact that backs you up in this such as a
May 10, 2003 @ 00:55 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: new njny
Thanks for the perspective on NY-NJ As to the river walk, I think a boat would help us get across mouths of tributaries; there are many ways to follow the
May 10, 2003 @ 01:18 - Flynn, Kevin ("Flynn, Kevin" <flynnk@...>)
- Re: new njny
hahahahaaaa what you mean us quimosabe hahaha & a river walk hahaha this is no river walk this is a freakin boundary walk & i never granted you any freakin
May 10, 2003 @ 01:18 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
- RE: [BoundaryPoint] Re: new njny
Re: River walk. I give up trying to talk sense to you. If you don t realize that people can walk a natural boundary such as the south bank of the Red -- given
May 10, 2003 @ 01:42 - Flynn, Kevin ("Flynn, Kevin" <flynnk@...>)
- Re: new njny
... thanx i graciously accept your resignation especially as i know you know you couldve maintained the draw & by repetition or stalemate equally well If you
May 10, 2003 @ 17:43 - acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)