it may be important to distinguish neutral zones from
condominiums &or tridominiums

for one thing i believe a neutral zone is always between 2 parties
rather than among 3

so neutral doesnt really quite mean no mans land
but rather neithers land

& i believe most if not all neutral zones
especially if they are designated no mans lands
are not really condominiums
but usually comprise a matching pair of marginal territories
much like a jointly contributed & jointly maintained clearcut zone
but typically wider & functionally more like a demilitarized or
united nations buffer zone
yet without the buffering third party necessarily present

but there is no reason to ascribe any of these highly peculiar
characteristics to byltlv

--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Jesper Nielsen"
<jesniel@i...> wrote:

> Talking about neutral zones on the BYLTLV-trpoint, it's stroke

me that these

> possible or actual neutral zones cannot be that neutral zone.
>
> If the BYLTLV area is neutral does it mean that I can go there

(by air

> without passport) and have just as many rights as a BY, LT or

LV citizen.

that would be a true everyones land you are talking about there
or an omnidominium
rather than just a tridominium
which as mentioned it evidently really isnt either
but i would still think it a good dance floor

>
> Or what about the neutral zones beween Gibraltar-Spain and

Spain-Marocco.

> Are they 100% neutral or are they not still related to the

neighbouring

> countries? So they are technically more a condominium than

neutral, right?

>
> Jesper