Subject: Re: hi
Date: Jan 25, 2003 @ 20:26
Author: acroorca2002 <orc@orcoast.com> ("acroorca2002 <orc@...>" <orc@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> it is a matter of american lawback that FL
> > that the state territorial seas of ak & hi per se & most other
> > coastal states dont extend more than 3nm from their coasts
>
> OK, but above you mention 3 or 9. Didn't we discuss a while
> extends 9 nmi and AL only 3 nmi?exactly
> From a legal standpoint, does the USyes definitely
> and Russia border?
> 1. One of the Alaskan islandsthem are
> lies beyond the IDL. I doubt this as as fat as I can see, all of
> on the Eastern side. I think the claimant may have confusedthe IDL with
> 180 ° longitude.good thinking
> 2. The IDL runs through an island (I assume away fromAntarctica, as this
> would not be interesting) and it was set there by mistake, notrealizing an
> island was there.awesome
> Midway is not part of HI, is it?yes i dont believe so
> I thought HI was primarily the 8and the other two
> islands. ummm. Kauai, Lanai, Oahu, Molechi, Maui, Hawaii
> (I think only 6 are inhabited, or one is a military island. Maybethat is
> why I only remember 6 of them).& that is also why i say