Subject: Re: Somewhat OT: Where does space begin
Date: Jan 16, 2003 @ 04:07
Author: acroorca2002 <orc@orcoast.com> ("acroorca2002 <orc@...>" <orc@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


--- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, "Karolis

> > because space expands the farther from the earth you go
> > the sizes of the countries are actually bigger up there
>
> yea, but to know by how much they expand and where to set
the
> borders, you would have to know where the space ends, and it
doesn't.

you wouldnt necessarily have to consider or know this

just imagine inflating a balloon with a global map printed on it
& watching all the countries grow constantly & proportionally
but just dont imagine the balloon ever bursting

this is a pretty fair model for the expansion i am referring to
& for what i think is actually expected
in the absense of any more exacting legal principle

> And if the height of the sovereignty is unlimited then all of the
> planets in the universe also fall in to some country, and into
> different countries at different times.

strange i admit but correct

> But to me it would make a lot of sense if the sovereignty ended
where
> the domain of our planet ends - the outer limit of the
atmosphere,
> tho I don't think that is set anywhere legaly.

right
& that was the question i believe

> But isn't there some
> UN resolution about usage of outer space and other palnets or
> something?

yes for everybody to go in peace & just have fun or something

> Also keep in mind that since air space and ground depths are
federal,

whaaattt

> administrational divisions don't really exist.

wow
i had thought that all countries & administrative divisions &
indeed every point on earth all converged to a single point at the
center of the earth
but continued to exist there
& at all levels everywhere
whether shrunken or inflated by relative elevation
both below & above the surface of the earth

i suppose your view is possible
but is there really some legal basis for it

i do believe there is a real basis for practically unlimited
subsurface & air rights tho

Because they can't
> because they are two dimensional in three dimensional
space. Or maybe
> you could say that the top layer of molecules on the ground
belongs
> to the state, district or whatever, everything else is federal.

bravo
youve spaced me out