Subject: Re: DC Border Marker Problematic
Date: Nov 23, 2002 @ 16:27
Author: acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


well then the poor victim woman you have in your office should
consult with your original questioner
who could lead her to the stone he saw & make her whole again

but as for your own insistence on their invisibility
i should probably repeat also
the many roadstones are low to the ground & 99 years old
so a few may have become dilapidated or decapitated or
covered over in the interim
but you might want to check
32 statutes at large 961
dated 3 march 1903
which ought to give the full list of their locations
for your future trypointing delectation

--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., "L. A. Nadybal" <lnadybal@c...> wrote:
> I have a woman in my office who, a month ago, got into a car
> "accident" (was forced off the road) at the border near the spot
> mentioned by the author of the comment I posted - she went to
the D C.
> police department, and they had to show here a map of the
expressway
> interchange at that spot. When she said "I just got onto to
ramp",
> the policeman said, "On the ramp? You were already in
Maryland at
> that point". She had to go to MD to file her accident report, and
got
> into difficulty there, because there was no marking on the
ramp, and
> they refused to believe here when she said where on the ramp
she
> "thought" she was at the time.
>
> Most D.C. border markers aren't visible from any roads around
here.
>
> Regards
>
> LN
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In BoundaryPoint@y..., "acroorca2002" <orc@o...> wrote:
> > len i think the only thing that might be problematic here is the
> > ignorance & pretentiousness of the writer
> > & ultimately his confusion of boundary markers with road
signs
> >
> > for to begin with
> > there are in fact at least a couple dozen milestones several
feet
> > tall all along the dc boundary