Subject: Re: US Border Controls and Canada -- an editorial
Date: Nov 07, 2002 @ 02:51
Author: Karolis B ("Karolis B" <kbajoras@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> It's such a weird issue... on one side, the border defines twosovereign nations -- who must look out for themselves and protect
>food, entertainment, cars, people, etc. are all the same. And I know
> When I go to the US, I don't feel like a foreigner -- the language,
>*grin*
> I still think things were better back in the days of the cold war.
>aware,
> Doug
>
>
>
> I allow myself a wry smile when I hear this argument. As you may be
> the UK refused to join the Schengen Area citing the same reasons,yet any
> regular traveller knows you can fly into certain regional airportsafter
> the passport and customs people have gone home. Even at LondonHeathrow,
> it's rare to find any customs officers in attendance after about8.00 PM.
>resources and
> I know the UK authorities will argue that they have limited
> prefer to target high-risk flights, but that only validates mypoint even
> more. They clearly don't consider flights from other EU/EEAcountries to be
> a high risk, so why keep up the pretence that border controls arenecessary
> to protect the nation? They serve only to inconvenience the vastmajority
> of legitimate travellers.controls
>
> Incidentally, I wonder how many people would tolerate border
> between the US states or Canadian provinces ;-)No strong opinion on the main issue, but I can say, Doug, Krispy
>
> Regards,
>
> Kevin Meynell