Subject: Re: Perejil as you have... -&gt; esma border at Ceuta<br/>
Date: Sep 26, 2002 @ 21:35<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="6876.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="7465.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic6838.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="7460.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="7462.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1907474781">--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;ps1966nl&quot; &lt;smaardijk@y...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; I see that the border (Spain/Neutral zone) was actually drawn on <br/>
 </span></blockquote>the <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; basis of the range of a certain type of cannon! Now this was at <br/>
 </span></blockquote>first <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; my hypothesis regarding the land boundary near Vianden <br/>
 </span></blockquote>(Luxembourg), <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; which later on I retracted, much to the chagrine of Michael who <br/>
 </span></blockquote>liked <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; the idea and even found the date of the invention of the cannon to <br/>
&gt; support it. But my wild guess was not as wild as it seemed then! <br/>
 </span></blockquote>BTW, <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; do you know what a &quot;cannon of 24 of the type anciently known&quot; (if I <br/>
&gt; translate it correctly) is, or was?<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>this from message 6869 is another example of a gratuitous smear<br/>
uncorrected til now<br/>
<br/>
the reference is evidently to my message 2124<br/>
where anyone who is interested will see that the socalled chagrine is <br/>
entirely & only in peters inventive but negative imagination<br/>
<br/>
so peter once again <br/>
i realize your english is not that of a native but<br/>
please be more careful especially about your personal imputations<br/>
<br/>
m</div>