Subject: Re: EU or not on the Euro<br/>
Date: Sep 20, 2002 @ 09:30<br/>
Author: anorak222 (&quot;anorak222&quot; &lt;listen@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="7320.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="7322.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic7218.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="7320.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="7322.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-321147670">--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;Peter Smaardijk&quot; &lt;smaardijk@y...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; And this DOM/TOM/rest distinction that France makes (and can be <br/>
 </span></blockquote>seen <br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; on the banknote)?<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>This is where the banknote design is inconsequent. It shows a <br/>
_geographical_ map of Europe, but non-Europen EU territories are <br/>
included, which is a _political_ notion.<br/>
<br/>
Regards</div>