Subject: Re: European tripoint lat & long list<br/>
Date: May 27, 2002 @ 18:55<br/>
Author: Grant Hutchison (&quot;Grant Hutchison&quot; &lt;granthutchison@blueyonder.co.uk&gt;)<br/>
<a href="6590.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="6730.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic6568.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="6593.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="6595.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-226838952"><blockquote><span title="ireply">&gt; &gt; with the notable exception of the latitude<br/>
&gt; &gt; of czdepl, which is adrift by several kilometres.<br/>
&gt; &gt; Anyone got any theories why that might be?<br/>
&gt; just the obvious first guess<br/>
&gt; since the order of magnitude is evidently about 10x<br/>
&gt; a single tiny transcription or typographical error<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Good suggestion. I don&#39;t think this has occurred in the WVS/WDB data in this<br/>
instance, because the data for the three joining borders are internally<br/>
consistent, and produce a map that looks consistent with other maps of the<br/>
area - I&#39;ve attached a jpeg, in case anyone can spot an anomaly in the<br/>
layout of the tripoint.<br/>
<br/>
Grant</div>