Subject: Re: more good news<br/>
Date: May 26, 2002 @ 22:44<br/>
Author: granthutchison (&quot;granthutchison&quot; &lt;granthutchison@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="6582.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="6584.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic6545.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="6582.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="6584.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1131560380">Len:<br/>
Maybe if you just think of Michael as a visitor from an alternate <br/>
reality, it would help.<br/>
<br/>
Michael:<br/>
How do you square your happy disregard for some future BoundaryPoint <br/>
dataloss with your recent urge to see someone catalogue and collate <br/>
our fabulous dataset? Is its present level of disorganisation not <br/>
just dataloss writ small? So then (by your worldview) surely we <br/>
shouldn&#39;t fret it ...<br/>
<br/>
Grant</div>