Subject: Re: more good news<br/>
Date: May 27, 2002 @ 00:49<br/>
Author: lnadybal (&quot;lnadybal&quot; &lt;lnadybal@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="6583.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="6585.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic6545.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="6583.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="6585.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1377772772">OK - I&#39;ll be me and Michael will continue.<br/>
End of thread.<br/>
LN<br/>
<br/>
--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;granthutchison&quot; &lt;granthutchison@b...&gt; <br/>
wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> &gt; Len:<br/>
&gt; Maybe if you just think of Michael as a visitor from an alternate <br/>
&gt; reality, it would help.<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; Michael:<br/>
&gt; How do you square your happy disregard for some future BoundaryPoint <br/>
&gt; dataloss with your recent urge to see someone catalogue and collate <br/>
&gt; our fabulous dataset? Is its present level of disorganisation not <br/>
&gt; just dataloss writ small? So then (by your worldview) surely we <br/>
&gt; shouldn&#39;t fret it ...<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; Grant </span></blockquote></div>