Subject: Re: lth<br/>
Date: May 07, 2002 @ 20:30<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="6412.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next&emsp;[<a href="topic6401.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="6413.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="6415.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1844194328">--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;ps1966nl&quot; &lt;smaardijk<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; O, is that your favourite row/question? Nice to know, I lost count of <br/>
<br/>
&gt; all your favourites.<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>well it isnt my only nor necessarily even my most favorite <br/>
<br/>
but it certainly is a favorite rowquestion of mine because i am generally so in the minority & on the run whenever it comes up<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; Yes, and if there was a hot air balloon tied to this tower, and Mr. <br/>
<br/>
&gt; Sparrow would have posted his call of nature on top of that?<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>hahahaha<br/>
<br/>
at that moment in time & so long as that baloon was affixed there that call of nature aka sps would indeed in my view be luh<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; If you build a long pier into sea, and make a, say, new nln in this <br/>
<br/>
&gt; way, but violating sea boundaries that take as a basis the base line, <br/>
<br/>
&gt; i.e. (+/-) the shore, you would get into trouble, I&#39;d think. Maybe <br/>
<br/>
&gt; it&#39;s time for baselines regulating the vertical...<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>when your pier grew so long as to violate a de jure boundary <br/>
<br/>
i expect you would soon be informed of it by the legally violated party<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
interesting also that that sealand platform harry or someone recently mentioned doesnt aggrieve anyone & for that reason doesnt get contradicted in the same way as your new nln would<br/>
<br/>
in fact apparently doesnt get contradicted at all<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
so btw i would call that sealand baby a real country<br/>
<br/>
but again i know you may all jump down my throat for saying this<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
but anyway back to your point about <br/>
<br/>
hahaha<br/>
<br/>
vertical baselines<br/>
<br/>
hahahahahahaha<br/>
<br/>
whaattt <br/>
<br/>
well yes thankfully i have gotten into trouble<br/>
<br/>
 <br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; You probably won&#39;t agree. But I agree that it is an interesting <br/>
<br/>
&gt; question. Maybe not my _favourite_, but what the heck...<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>much obliged for this too<br/>
<br/>
 <br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; &quot;really<br/>
<br/>
&gt; i dont mean to be narrow minded yet i imagine you may all disagree <br/>
<br/>
&gt; vehemently&quot;<br/>
<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; ...whatever gave you that idea... ?<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>the prevailing reverence for received wisdom <br/>
<br/>
& allergy to simple perceptions & new ideas<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
m</div>