acroorca2002 wrote:
"thanxx peter for this harmony & also for renewing my favorite row er
question about that special boundary point where nature ends & art
begins"

O, is that your favourite row/question? Nice to know, I lost count of
all your favourites.

"& i would like to take this opportunity to repeat that i think man &
works of man are an integral part of nature
& that artificial is just as natural & just as real as natural is
& also to remind doubters that the boundaries & even the very idea of
a state such as luxembourg are already an artifice or work of man so
how could anything lower than the bird droppings at the very top of
that tower be the top of luxembourg"

Yes, and if there was a hot air balloon tied to this tower, and Mr.
Sparrow would have posted his call of nature on top of that?

If you build a long pier into sea, and make a, say, new nln in this
way, but violating sea boundaries that take as a basis the base line,
i.e. (+/-) the shore, you would get into trouble, I'd think. Maybe
it's time for baselines regulating the vertical...

You probably won't agree. But I agree that it is an interesting
question. Maybe not my _favourite_, but what the heck...

"really
i dont mean to be narrow minded yet i imagine you may all disagree
vehemently"

...whatever gave you that idea... ?

Peter S.