thanxx peter for this harmony & also for renewing my favorite row er
question about that special boundary point where nature ends & art
begins

& i would like to take this opportunity to repeat that i think man &
works of man are an integral part of nature
& that artificial is just as natural & just as real as natural is
& also to remind doubters that the boundaries & even the very idea of
a state such as luxembourg are already an artifice or work of man so
how could anything lower than the bird droppings at the very top of
that tower be the top of luxembourg
really
i dont mean to be narrow minded yet i imagine you may all disagree
vehemently
m

--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., "ps1966nl" <smaardijk@y...> wrote:
> acroorca2002 wrote:
> "(...)i agree its great to be on top of anything (...)"
>
> Yes, great Jan! Also, every time I see a country with a highest
point
> that falls below that of the Netherlands, I feel somewhat
vindicated,
> living in a country that is called the way it is.
>
> Just joking, of course...
>
> Anyway, a picture of luh can be seen on
> http://www.benni.lu/wellef/huldange00/huldange00-1.html . This is
the
> Buurgplaatz (one of maybe half a dozen of spellings, actually),
which
> is 559 m. above sea level. I visited the spot lately, but it's not
> really a nice spot to photograph. So I didn't. There is this water
> tower there, and some sort of artificial hill (a couple of metres
> high) against the back of the tower. I don't know whether that
> influences these 559 m. It wouldn't count, I'd say.
>
> The hill is well within Luxembourg, but very close to the belu
> border, near the old bedelu tripoint (I promise to post a couple of
> pictures within a day or two).
>
> Peter S.