Subject: Re: The uncrossed hotwater tour
Date: Apr 24, 2002 @ 19:24
Author: acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


ok
this is just to add to the bottom of the following surrender in
progress to general grant already destined to be president grant of
everyones land

but before i do
let me just explain that tho i began the day in great barrington
posting to the general jesper i was next forced to retreat across the
border to canaan yet still well within the greater great barrington
area for the beginning of this negotiation with the general grant
& have just been forced to drop back yet again to my specific former
headquarters in salisbury within a still greater reckoning of greater
great barrington but not yet within the greatest greater great
barrington possible which would certainly have to include ctmany
& so there i mentioned a tripoint already

but now
the reason why the borders change sides when they cross a border at a
border cross is also perfectly obvious
for they themselves are crossing the border
so they would have to change sides
like numbers changing signs
& that is true both mathematically & philologically too

so it seems to me that i have nothing to prove to sustain a draw
either
& there never was any contest anyway

& i think doug has been calling for a mexican standoff too with that
border crossing book

so to me it is looking very much like a grandmaster draw after only
6345 moves by repetition & i would be willing to shake your hands &
salute all bipartite quadripoints & border crosses alike everywhere
if that would suit you gentlemen

m

m

--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., "acroorca2002" <orc@o...> wrote:
> --- In BoundaryPoint@y..., "granthutchison" <granthutchison@b...>
> wrote:
> > Michael:
> > > > What we can say, though, is that a *fully crossed* hotwater
> tour
> > > > is impossible
> > > as well as unnecessary & irrelevant
> > Fair enough. I raised the topic only because I'd briefly
> entertained
> > the notion that an uncrossed tour *implied* the existence of a
> > crossed tour, too. You (general rather than specific "you", in
this
> > instance) could perhaps just cross each quadripoint and find
> yourself
> > reversing the line of march for alternating line segments -
> > effectively covering the same route but walking it in a different
> > order, and half the time in the opposite direction. But the
> formation
> > of little closed loops precluded that.
> > Shame. I was quite looking forward to presenting you with a
crossed
> > tour.
> >
> > Grant
>
> dear general grant
>
> whaattt anyway
>
> for even the general me is staggered lee & windward here
>
> but ok i will eat this intended present shamelessly too
>
> still stunned & basking in the afterglow of your great new ulyssead
> for yes i really think we must rename even the odyssey itself now
too
> in honor of your true sawanabori both mathematical & philological
of
> the craziest checkerboard in the world to its true source ulysses
> grant
>
> but sir i am prepared to make some concessions
>
> first evidently boundaries do or at least can have handedness & at
> their best they even have evenhandedness
>
> boundaries to that extent have vectorhoods
>
> i am not prepared to concede that boundaries move
> nor that they would even recognize your well gesticulated tour as
> motion of any sort
>
> about borders
> borders still cross
> prima facie & unrebutted
> & they change sides when they cross
>
> excuse me
> i am being interrupted here in canaan
> later
> m