Subject: Re: re places with few to zero tripoints<br/>
Date: Apr 11, 2002 @ 16:16<br/>
Author: ps1966nl (&quot;ps1966nl&quot; &lt;smaardijk@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="6173.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="6175.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic6148.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="6173.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="6175.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-677523866">acroorca2002 wrote:<br/>
&quot;(...)feast your eyes on greenlands 3 divisions & lonely tripoint at <br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.mindspring.com/~gwil/mgl.html">http://www.mindspring.com/~gwil/mgl.html</a> (...)&quot;<br/>
<br/>
Strange, though, that apparently there is a part of Greenland that is <br/>
not incorporated into any municipality whatsoever, but is an <br/>
extramunicipal national park, which nevertheless seems to be divided <br/>
by this &quot;provincial&quot; boundary. Cf. the map at the url mentioned above <br/>
with this one: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.statgreen.gl/kort/indexmap.html">http://www.statgreen.gl/kort/indexmap.html</a><br/>
<br/>
Peter S.</div>