Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: N274 handed over to the Germans<br/>
Date: Feb 26, 2002 @ 09:15<br/>
Author: Pepijn Hendriks (&quot;Pepijn Hendriks&quot; &lt;pepijnh@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="5757.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="5763.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic5753.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="5761.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="5763.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1012891879">&quot;ps1966nl&quot; &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:smaardijk@...">smaardijk@...</a>&gt; wrote: <br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; Existed, because I too read that the treaty reg. the transfer has <br/>
&gt; been signed. Acc. to the local newspaper De Limburger that has <br/>
&gt; happened today. <br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Would this mean that the treaty, now officially signed, is now sent on <br/>
to the parliaments of both countries to be ratified? We should keep an <br/>
eye open on the document servers of the respective parliaments then. <br/>
<br/>
(This does mean that the treaty comes into effect before ratification. I <br/>
wonder, is this the usual way to do it?)<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; No, I don&#39;t know. It might be a typo. But the old designations of the<br/>
&gt; Rijkswegenplan definitely do differ from the signposted designations that<br/>
&gt; are made up of N+digits. So it might even be true.<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>If it was a typo, it would be consistent typo in both the <br/>
parliamentarian&#39;s question as well as the answer of the minister. You&#39;d <br/>
think that at least one of them would get their facts straight. <br/>
<br/>
-Pepijn<br/>
<br/>
-- <br/>
 <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:pepijnh@...">pepijnh@...</a> -- <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.bigfoot.com/~pepijnh">http://www.bigfoot.com/~pepijnh</a> -- ICQ - 6033220</div>