Subject: Re: reflections on the crosses old & new<br/>
Date: Dec 13, 2001 @ 07:45<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="5109.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next&emsp;[<a href="topic5096.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="5115.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="5117.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1698548668">--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;granthutchison&quot; &lt;granthutchison@b...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; Michael:<br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; well you certainly may do all that & think all that & thus spare <br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; yourself the benefit &or deficit of the crosses <br/>
<br/>
&gt; Sorry. I&#39;m not being deliberately, serially perverse, even though it<br/>
<br/>
&gt; may seem that way. I was just wondering if there was a reason you felt<br/>
<br/>
&gt; some borders (Baarle) crossed and some (Jungholz) didn&#39;t. The crossing<br/>
<br/>
&gt; thing really does give me an uneasy feeling of the country somehow<br/>
<br/>
&gt; turning inside out at the cross-over point - a sort of gross Klein bottle.<br/>
<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; Grant<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>well it is all in good fun as well as perverse but i do really feel or at least would like to believe & so would maintain that all biquadrijunctions are crosses no matter whether they are strictly cruciform or not<br/>
<br/>
m</div>