Subject: Re: reflections on the crosses old & new<br/>
Date: Dec 13, 2001 @ 00:08<br/>
Author: granthutchison (&quot;granthutchison&quot; &lt;granthutchison@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="5108.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="5116.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic5096.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="5108.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="5110.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1137528042">Michael:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; well you certainly may do all that & think all that & thus spare <br/>
&gt; yourself the benefit &or deficit of the crosses <br/>
 </span></blockquote>Sorry. I&#39;m not being deliberately, serially perverse, even though it<br/>
may seem that way. I was just wondering if there was a reason you felt<br/>
some borders (Baarle) crossed and some (Jungholz) didn&#39;t. The crossing<br/>
thing really does give me an uneasy feeling of the country somehow<br/>
turning inside out at the cross-over point - a sort of gross Klein bottle.<br/>
<br/>
Grant</div>