Subject: Re: "Pene-enclave"
Date: Dec 13, 2001 @ 07:31
Author: acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> > but that is only the last of its problems since a penultimate problemyes indeed & i have always deferred & will continue to defer to both of you & to everyone else here in all discussions of functionality since my own assumption is that we have been focusing primarily here upon the realities of the boundaries themselves & have been talking by our own deliberate choice mainly about the boundary lines per se & the shapes they enclose & most especially about the liveliest points upon the boundaries & hence primarily about the geometry & topology of all these things rather than necessarily about how they may or may not function or how they may or may not affect people or what to do or not do about a dead body found upon them or what happens or doesnt happen to the boundaries themselves when they die etc etc etc & that any discussion of functionality etc etc is altho occasionally interesting & even lively nevertheless emphatically off topic or at least off what i personally had understood the topic & purpose & actual life of the list was from my readings of its various descriptions & there you have the reason grant for my evidently mistaken surmise of your meaning above because i imagined you were talking & playing straight bp too as you usually do
> > is that not only the etymology & usage but also the shape of
> > peninsula tend to influence your word away from the jungholzian
> > meaning i surmise you intend for it
> Ah, good job I asked. As described by Brendan it's a functional rather
> than topological definition. So it would include *some* peninsula-like
> features, but not others (though I assume all point connections
> [crossed or uncrossed!] necessarily make access easier from the
> surrounding country).
> Grant