Subject: Re: nysw and pane report
Date: Dec 10, 2001 @ 07:10
Author: acroorca2002 ("acroorca2002" <orc@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


you are right mr butlerus about the nje njnypa witness match as these 2 came first & both date from 1882 but dont you also see that all 5 ny witness stones including pane nysw & pan all dating from the early 1880s are far more similar than dissimilar in size shape etc as well as distinctly unlike any others & certainly not of ellicott vintage in any case or are you still believing that too

m



--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., "bjbutlerus" <bjbutler@b...> wrote:

> I mentioned NJE because the monument at the top of the cliffs near

> there (on the NJ/NY line) is IDENTICAL in form to the witness

> monument near NJNYPA (also on the NJ/NY line). As I said, I have

> not seen the one near PANE. However, the two I have seen differ

> markedly from the monument near PAN. They differ in size, shape,

> finish, and inscription style.

>

> BJB

>

> > you are right that there are some slight differences among the 4

> witness monuments i am talking about & i have no idea why you

> mention nje even if you really mean pae because their markers if any

> dont in either case announce nypa into its distinct sectors the way

> the monuments at dry pan nysw delpane & njnypa all together do if

> you see what i mean for you can on a map of the entire boundary

> which was remonumented between 1881 & 1885 so for that reason & to

> that extent these 4 rocks do differ stylistically & of course the

> leaner was also unique in specially commemorating the original

> ellicott survey but you really should see delpane because once more

> it will be like deja vu all over again

> >

> > m

> >

> >

> >

> > --- In BoundaryPoint@y..., "bjbutlerus" <bjbutler@b...> wrote:

> >

> > > The monument near PANE-On-Erie is not of the same design as the

> ones

> >

> > > near NJNYPA, NYSW, or NJE for that matter. The former is not

> >

> > > tapered and has no pediment, the radius at the top is larger and

> the

> >

> > > top is flat istead of roof-shaped. It also has an inscription

> on

> >

> > > the skinny side, whereas the latter do not. I don't know about

> >

> > > PANE-On-Delaware because I have not seen it.

> >

> > >

> >

> > > BJB

> >

> > >

> >

> > >

> >

> > > > nor was the tall leaning monument near dry pan the one placed

> by

> >

> > > ellicott there as some others believe but is recognizably a

> relic of

> >

> > > the same 1880s nypa doings that left very similar witness rocks

> near

> >

> > > njnypa & nysw & that other pane point on the delaware thus

> totalling

> >

> > > 4 in all some of which you & some others here may also recognize

> by

> >

> > > their distinctive appearance

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > m