Subject: Re: gbfrnl, evhritsi, cafr, etc<br/>
Date: Dec 09, 2001 @ 05:06<br/>
Author: acroorca2002 (&quot;acroorca2002&quot; &lt;orc@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="5007.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next&emsp;[<a href="topic4988.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="5016.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="5018.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1439297073">--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;granthutchison&quot; &lt;granthutchison@b...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; For consistencey, and by previous example, the<br/>
<br/>
&gt; wet Croatian triangle is an exclave.<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>that choice is fortunate also because the triangle actually appears to be an exclave of croatian sovereign territory <br/>
<br/>
& moreover to disqualify it because of certain sovereign rights associated with an actually noncontiguous nonsovereign territorial area would compound the error & produce our first multi incoherency<br/>
<br/>
m</div>