Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: oldest purely &#39;fiat&#39; international boundary?<br/>
Date: Dec 05, 2001 @ 04:47<br/>
Author: Anton Sherwood (Anton Sherwood &lt;bronto@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="4945.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4950.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic4932.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="4946.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4948.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-58215736">&quot;L. A. Nadybal&quot; wrote:<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; . . . I don&#39;t recall that Hadrian&#39;s wall particularly followed along<br/>
&gt; geographically convenient elements such as streams, etc.<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>Not many available there!  Though I think the wall prefers<br/>
north-facing slopes, so that the Picts would have to charge uphill.<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
-- <br/>
Anton Sherwood  --  <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.ogre.nu/">http://www.ogre.nu/</a></div>