Subject: Re: Class A, B, C, D, E, ? visits??<br/>
Date: Nov 27, 2001 @ 00:21<br/>
Author: orc@orcoast.com (orc@...)<br/>
<a href="4727.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next&emsp;[<a href="topic4727.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="4733.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4735.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-801480012">harry<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; Who can please explain to me what all these classes are about?<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>well maybe 4 years ago some of us including most notably the butlers & myself were making an ongoing study of the qualitative aspects of try pointing tries & at various times we tried to classify the most clearly distict categories of success or closeness of encounter & tho i recall reaching the letter z at one point to indicate an almost unnoticeable interest in someone elses try from the comfort of ones easy chair nevertheless it has seemed to me that the best & simplest classification system embraces only 5 degrees of success & deliberately fails to reach the letter f so that the 5 classes in order of descending precision are<br/>
<br/>
a  absolutely arrived at authoritative accuracy<br/>
<br/>
b  basically been baptised bare bottom<br/>
<br/>
     & best possible for unmarked wetpoints  <br/>
<br/>
c  clear clean closeup camera call<br/>
<br/>
d  distant diffused depiction deserving   <br/>
<br/>
e  elusively excellent etc<br/>
<br/>
but as for what they are about i guess it is just ready reference & comparison tho i suppose they could also become part of a scoring system too if someone could think up a suitable game<br/>
<br/>
m</div>