Subject: Re: Nautical mile defined!<br/>
Date: Nov 27, 2001 @ 00:48<br/>
Author: orc@orcoast.com (orc@...)<br/>
<a href="4725.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next&emsp;[<a href="topic4713.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="4734.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4736.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-459460876">--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;Grant Hutchison&quot; &lt;granthutchison@b...&gt; wrote:<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="ireply"> &gt; Michael:<br/>
<br/>
&gt; &gt; er would that be nad83 or what<br/>
<br/>
&gt; NAD83 - I used the GRS80 ellipsoid for the calcs, which is the<br/>
<br/>
&gt; standard ellipsoid for NAD83.<br/>
<br/>
&gt; Let&#39;s just not get into the lumpy geoid and sea surface topography, eh?<br/>
<br/>
&gt; <br/>
<br/>
&gt; Grant<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>ok but why not<br/>
<br/>
would acknowledging these mean we would have to put an asterisk next to your world accuracy record<br/>
<br/>
m<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
& did you notice how crude those ibc 49th parallel coords were by comparison<br/>
<br/>
& they were for decimal minutes not even real decimal seconds</div>