Subject: Re: Baarle map errata<br/>
Date: Nov 22, 2001 @ 12:43<br/>
Author: Peter Smaardijk (&quot;Peter Smaardijk&quot; &lt;smaardijk@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="4579.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next&emsp;[<a href="topic4578.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="4600.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4602.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-213068687">AND the Loveren enclave is missing on the Dutch map!<br/>
<br/>
Peter S.<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> --- In BoundaryPoint@y..., &quot;Brendan Whyte&quot; &lt;brwhyte@h...&gt; wrote:<br/>
&gt; The attached files copy Jesper&#39;s Withagen correction for 5 other <br/>
lacunae in <br/>
&gt; the Dutch 25k maps of Baarle. Excuse the weird colours in the first <br/>
two. I <br/>
&gt; am still learing how to use Corel.<br/>
&gt; 1. The boundary shown on the Dutch map in the vicinity of <br/>
Zondereihgen has a <br/>
&gt; section of road apparently enclaved. This is wrong and should be <br/>
removed.<br/>
&gt; 2. H17 is missing from the Dutch maps (but not the Belgian).<br/>
&gt; 3. H12 ditto<br/>
&gt; 4. A stalk of H8 protruding south through several buildings towards <br/>
H9 is <br/>
&gt; also missing.<br/>
&gt; 5. N3 is missing.<br/>
&gt; BW<br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; <br/>
&gt; _________________________________________________________________<br/>
&gt; Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp">http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp</a> </span></blockquote></div>