Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: US counties, unincorprated territories
Date: Nov 10, 2001 @ 21:52
Author: m donner ("m donner" <maxivan82@...>)
Prev    Post in Topic    Next [All Posts]
Prev    Post in Time    Next


bus&ss p122 says
in digest
congress consented to the erection of texas to statehood
provided it meaning congress retained the right to erect up to 4 new
states from the territory of the republic of texas
& provided texas then consented to their erection

it then goes on to say verbatim
texas does not appear to have acquired by this proviso any advantages over
other states
as it merely can give its consent to a division of its area
the right to make the commendation or request for the division apparently
resting with congress

of course parts of 5 states
new mexico
oklahoma
kansas
colorado
wyoming
have already been made of the original texas

perhaps a violation of the law that says only up to 4

but not a single whole state has actually been erected

m



>From: Arif Samad <fHoiberg@...>
>Reply-To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
>To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: US counties, unincorprated territories
>Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 08:48:24 -0800 (PST)
>
>Few things.
>First of all, Texas can split into five states or
>probably the correct way to put is four states can
>secede out of it.
>The Bahraini piece in Qatar originate from the ghost
>town of Zubara, which Bahraini has claimed since way
>back yonder. Though before the British came in, it
>was just a tax dispute, it became a land dispute
>afterwards.
>The special thing about Hawaii is that it was the only
>place that was a separate kingdom before becoming
>American. Damn those Doles.
>Arif
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Find a job, post your resume.
>http://careers.yahoo.com


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp