Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] US counties, unincorprated territories<br/>
Date: Nov 06, 2001 @ 18:01<br/>
Author: m donner (&quot;m donner&quot; &lt;maxivan82@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="4387.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4399.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic4366.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="4387.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="4389.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1368488684"><blockquote><span title="ireply">&gt;From: PitHokie<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;I cant think of any area of land in the US that is<br/>
&gt;unincorporated by not governed by some body, like<br/>
&gt;those you&#39;ve mentioned in Australia.<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt;--- Brendan Whyte &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:brwhyte@...">brwhyte@...</a>&gt; wrote:<br/>
&gt; &gt; The NW corner of NSW is not part of any shire or<br/>
&gt; &gt; city. It is termed<br/>
&gt; &gt; &#39;unincorporated area&#39; on maps.<br/>
<br/>
 </span></blockquote>arif has pointed out in his weekly geographical curiosities<br/>
  for which see our top bp bookmarks link<br/>
that the montana portion of yellowstone park hasnt been included in any <br/>
county<br/>
tho the idaho & wyoming portions have been<br/>
<br/>
so evidently there may be this purely federal area embedded within montana<br/>
<br/>
m<br/>
<br/>
btw<br/>
arif<br/>
wake up<br/>
we cant get enough of these gems & you<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
_________________________________________________________________<br/>
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp">http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp</a></div>