Subject: hrsi border talks lead to wet hr exclave??<br/>
Date: Sep 19, 2001 @ 21:34<br/>
Author: Peter Smaardijk (&quot;Peter Smaardijk&quot; &lt;smaardijk@...&gt;)<br/>
Prev&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="3907.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic3906.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="3905.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="3907.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1320116612">Some more news on the Croatian-Slovenian border talks, as first <br/>
mentioned by Marcel, can be found at <br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.vitrum.si/secret/sw2001-28/weekly2001-28-1.htm">http://www.vitrum.si/secret/sw2001-28/weekly2001-28-1.htm</a> . It seems <br/>
that the Krsko (caron on s) nuclear power station is not going to be <br/>
a condominium; merely the question of joint ownership was discussed <br/>
(what was the outcome is not clear to me). What _is_ strange, <br/>
however, is the maritime delimitation agreed upon: 1. Slovenia keeps <br/>
(or gets) its exit to int&#39;l waters, but 2. Croatian waters continue <br/>
to border Italian waters. Am I right in assuming that this means <br/>
there is a watery hr exclave, bordering it and si waters and possibly <br/>
international waters, but detached from the rest of the hr terr. <br/>
waters? (We&#39;re obviously not talking EEZ&#39;s here) I think this is <br/>
meant by the &quot;small triangle&quot; mentioned here.<br/>
<br/>
Peter S.</div>