You can read about the border agreement here as well:
http://www.rferl.org/balkan-report/2001/08/54-030801.html
Here, some nice insights in border drawing ("a line 25 m thick is too
thick"), and a fluvial border rectification not unlike the one which
took place between cz and sk.
AND another restaurant split by a border, of course (we can start a
collection now, methinks...)
Peter S.
--- In BoundaryPoint@y..., "Peter Smaardijk" <smaardijk@y...> wrote:
> Some more news on the Croatian-Slovenian border talks, as first
> mentioned by Marcel, can be found at
> http://www.vitrum.si/secret/sw2001-28/weekly2001-28-1.htm . It
seems
> that the Krsko (caron on s) nuclear power station is not going to
be
> a condominium; merely the question of joint ownership was discussed
> (what was the outcome is not clear to me). What _is_ strange,
> however, is the maritime delimitation agreed upon: 1. Slovenia
keeps
> (or gets) its exit to int'l waters, but 2. Croatian waters continue
> to border Italian waters. Am I right in assuming that this means
> there is a watery hr exclave, bordering it and si waters and
possibly
> international waters, but detached from the rest of the hr terr.
> waters? (We're obviously not talking EEZ's here) I think this is
> meant by the "small triangle" mentioned here.
>
> Peter S.