ok
thanx
what direction is the camera facing in this new pic
in view of your new guess & pending your answer to the
above
i am beginning to think the tripoint rock may actually
be visible in the satpic as the vaguely rectangular
form about 10 meters almost due north of your pushpin
it would be odd if all these similarly sized &
similarly colored rocks showed up so clearly without
the tripoint rock itself being visible too
also i wonder if any of the other visitors might have
an opinion
here are the images again for easy reference & perhaps
even a bit enlarged
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.culture.discuss.boundary-point/9325
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.culture.discuss.boundary-point/9256
--- Jesper Nielsen/Borderbase <jesper@...>
wrote:
> Yes. ATHUSK is strangely very hard.
>
> The image is very good, and there are so many clues.
> Inspite of two visits,
> plenty of photos and a video I am still not sure.
> However I belive I am
> closer than you. I might move it 6-10 meters further
> NW.
>
> It's true - the tp monument appears to be invisible
> from space. I used the
> triangle sculpture to place the pin, but I am having
> a different one. See
> attachment.
>
> Jesper
> --
> Borderbase - your online guide to international
> borders and tripoints
> http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase
>
>
> _____
>
> Fra: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com] På
> vegne af aletheia kallos
> Sendt: 18. september 2006 06:21
> Til: boundarypoint@yahoogroups.com
> Emne: [BoundaryPoint] athusk
>
>
>
> this is my most hesitant try of the tour so far
> because i realize jesper has actually visited this
> place & i havent
> so what right do i have to second guess his
> certainty
> if thats indeed what it is
>
> but this burgenland zoomable map
> http://gis.bgld.
>
<http://gis.bgld.gv.at/SynerGISWeb/FrontController?project=kataster>
> gv.at/SynerGISWeb/FrontController?project=kataster
> appears to indicate the nw & sw approach roads
> entirely within austria
>
> so for this reason alone i have stretched my
> tripoint
> position to reflect that appearance or belief
> however tentatively
>
> but also
> this pic seems to show some of the triangular
> sculptures that are visible on the satpic in
> relation
> to the tripoint marker
> http://img.geocachi
>
<http://img.geocaching.com/cache/log/d2c75a93-a129-4e58-8c98-fd741d99009d.jp
> g>
>
ng.com/cache/log/d2c75a93-a129-4e58-8c98-fd741d99009d.jpg
> which apparently is not visible itself on the satpic
> or else not yet recognized as such
>
> very strange
>
> but anyway maybe jesper or another of the actual
> visitors can clarify this situation & correct my
> mistake if thats what it is
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail. <http://mail.yahoo.com> yahoo.com
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com