Subject: SV: SV: [BoundaryPoint] athusk
Date: Sep 28, 2006 @ 21:17
Author: Jesper Nielsen/Borderbase ("Jesper Nielsen/Borderbase" <jesper@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
ok
thanx
what direction is the camera facing in this new pic
in
view of your new guess & pending your answer to the
above
i am
beginning to think the tripoint rock may actually
be visible in the satpic as
the vaguely rectangular
form about 10 meters almost due north of your
pushpin
it would be odd if all these similarly sized &
similarly
colored rocks showed up so clearly without
the tripoint rock itself being
visible too
also i wonder if any of the other visitors might have
an
opinion
here are the images again for easy reference &
perhaps
even a bit enlarged
http://article. gmane.org/ gmane.culture. discuss.boundary -point/9325
http://article. gmane.org/ gmane.culture. discuss.boundary -point/9256
---
Jesper Nielsen/Borderbase <jesper@nicolette. dk>
wrote:
>Yes. ATHUSK is strangely very hard.
>there are so many clues.
> The image is very good, and
> Inspite of two visits,and a video I am still not sure.
> plenty of photos
> However I belive I amthan you. I might move it 6-10 meters further
> closer
> NW.true - the tp monument appears to be invisible
>
> It's
> from space. I usedthe
> triangle sculpture to place the pin, but I am havingdifferent one. See
> a
> attachment.--
>
> Jesper
>
> Borderbase - your online guide to internationaltripoints
> borders and
>href="http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase">http://www.nicolett e.dk/borderbase
>href="mailto:BoundaryPoint%40yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@ yahoogroups. com
>
> _____
>
> Fra:
>[mailto:BoundaryPoint@ yahoogroups. com] På
> vegne af aletheia kallos06:21
> Sendt: 18. september 2006
> Til:href="mailto:boundarypoint%40yahoogroups.com">boundarypoint@ yahoogroups. com
>Emne: [BoundaryPoint] athusk
>hesitant try of the tour so far
>
>
> this is my most
> because i realize jesper has actuallyvisited this
> place & i haventsecond guess his
> so what right do i have to
> certaintyhref="http://gis.bgld.">http://gis.bgld.
> if thats indeed what it is
>
> but this burgenland zoomable map
>
><http://gis.bgld. gv.at/SynerGISWe b/FrontControlle r?project= kataster>
>gv.at/SynerGISWeb/ FrontController? project=kataster
> appears toindicate the nw & sw approach roads
> entirely within austriaposition to reflect that appearance or belief
>
> so for this reason alone i have stretched my
> tripoint
>
> howevertentatively
>triangular
> but also
> this pic seems to show some of the
> sculptures that are visible on the satpic inrelation
>
> to the tripoint markerhref="http://img.geocachi">http://img.geocachi
>
><http://img.geocachi ng.com/cache/ log/d2c75a93- a129-4e58- 8c98-fd741d99009 d.jp
>g>
>ng.com/cache/ log/d2c75a93- a129-4e58- 8c98-fd741d99009 d.jpg
>which apparently is not visible itself on the satpic
> or else not yetrecognized as such
>maybe jesper or another of the actual
> very strange
>
> but anyway
> visitors can clarify thissituation & correct my
> mistake if thats what it is____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __
>
>
>Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spamprotection around
>
> http://mail. <href="http://mail.yahoo.com">http://mail. yahoo.com> yahoo.com
>____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __
>
>