Subject: afcnpk test was a success so continuing with afcntj & afirpk etc
Date: Sep 08, 2006 @ 13:48
Author: aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@yahoo.com>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> > all 3 treaties mentioning this tripointsummit
> > namely afcn & afsu & cnsu
> > actually delineate their convergent borders along
> the ridge lines & water divides
> > which tho not necessarily always the same thing
> everywhere
> > do meet perfectly on the soviet topos
> > at their common trijunction point nearest the
> of povalo shveikovskihttp://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Centr._Asia/Topo%20maps_500k/J-43-V.jpg
>
>snowy
> for this reason i would place the pushpin at the
> ridge junctiongeocoord
> east southeastward of the tripoint position shown in
> the google border line overlay
> as indicated there at roughly
> n lat 37d14m02s & e long 74d63m23s
>
> & i would consider that correct only to within about
> 100 meters
> owing to the limitations of the photography &
> registry etchttp://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Centr._Asia/Topo%20maps_500k/H-41-V.jpg
> albeit the best known try to date
> per the treaties & soviet topos this tripoint is
> evidently on the highest summit of the kuh i malik
> siah massif
>
> tho it isnt absolutely clear which of the several__________________________________________________
> roughly equally high points this actually refers to
>
> my fairly confident guess tho is that the google
> borders are showing this situation almost exactly
> right
> for a change
> even tho the tripoint depiction does clearly fall a
> bit below the peak & in fact some 50 meters east of
> the likeliest summit point
> which my mouse makes out to be at about
> n lat 29d51m41s & w long 60d52m41s
>
> & this is offered with the usual caveat of up to 100
> meters of possible error
> but only if i do indeed have the right summit
> for otherwise this guess could still be much farther astray