as you say could not be very much higher
please be aware
the map if it can be believed shows the tripoint 2
distinct levels above the normal water level of the
recognizably outlined lake
&
at least some if not all the elevation gradients are
250 meters apart

--- "Lowell G. McManus" <lgm@...> wrote:

> Jesper,
>
> Thanks very much for the three PDF maps of the area
> and the referral to Google Earth. When Google Earth
> debuted, I tried it, but it did not work for me. I
> tried it again today, and it works great!
>
> I think that your PDF maps demonstrate that the lake
> in the tripoint depression is variable in level and
> size over time or season, flooding the tripoint at
> times. Since this appears to be the case, the
> tripoint could not be very much higher in elevation
> than the more regularly wet lakebed farther
> southeast.
>
> Lowell G. McManus
> Leesville, Louisiana, USA
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jesper Nielsen/Borderbase
> To: BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 1:47 PM
> Subject: SV: SV: [BoundaryPoint] yikes kztmuz is
> reportedly undelineated & definitely elusive
>
>
> No fancy results of terrain (or 3d) to show as the
> entire areas is very flat. The tripoint itself is at
> water level at 0m and the surroundings do no go
> higher than 160 meters.
>
> But please learn to use the free Google Earth,
> downloadable at http://earth.google.com , yourself.
>
> Jesper
> --
> Borderbase - your online guide to international
> borders and tripoints
> http://www.nicolette.dk/borderbase

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com