Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: breakaway montenegro tripoints are looking like the winners
Date: Jun 05, 2006 @ 13:59
Author: aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos <aletheiak@...>)
Prev Post in Topic Next [All Posts]
Prev Post in Time Next
> Those are all good points.http://www.focus-fen.net/index.php?catid=137&newsid=89607&ch=0
>
> However, you gave odds on a race to Turtle Bay.
> That is the only reason
> that I discussed the rebalkanization of the Balkans
> in such terms. I
> have never regarded the UN very highly, and I
> certainly don't consider
> it the arbiter of national sovereignty. If a
> broadly recognized new
> nation choose not to join the UN, or if an
> established nation got miffed
> and quit it, neither would be less a sovereign
> nation nor less capable
> of tripoints. (By so stating, I don't mean imply
> that you would
> disagree.)
>
> Diglyphs and UN seats might be convenient tools for
> tripointers, but we
> must be prepared to improvise otherwise when the
> situation demands.
>
> Lowell G. McManus
> Leesville, Louisiana, USA
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "aletheia kallos" <aletheiak@...>
> To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 6:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Re: breakaway
> montenegro tripoints are
> looking like the winners
>
>
> > thanx
> > all good points
> > which further inform & hedge my handicapping
> > assessment that practically anything could still
> > happen on the way to turtle bay
> >
> > & of course it is the new tripoints & their
> promotion
> > to the world class
> > that we are most interested in here
> > rather than simply the birth or rebirth of these 2
> new
> > countries & their newly international border
> >
> > & yes of course
> > what i have been calling the new breakaway
> montenegro
> > tripoints for want of a better name are in fact
> just
> > as much the new breakaway serbia tripoints
> > even tho it is technically & sentimentally
> montenegro
> > who has divorced serbia rather than vice versa
> >
> > more accurate would be just to think of them as
> > t h e
> > 2 new tricountry points
> >
> > part of the difficulty here btw is that we dont
> yet
> > have & cant even yet imagine the iso digraphs for
> > these 2 new countries
> > let alone the resulting tripoint hexaglyphs
> > so the terminology is still very crude compared to
> our
> > usual coding
> >
> >
> > & to try to answer your question
> >
> > when the czechoslovakian seat for example split
> into
> > the separate czech & slovak seats
> > which is the best & most exact analogy & precedent
> i
> > can think of
> > each was admitted into the general assembly as a
> new
> > entity on the same day
> > perhaps even simultaneously in photo finish mode
> for
> > all i know
> > & their old seat was simply abandoned
> > much like their old iso digraph
> > which neither of them actually inherited either
> >
> > but not every rump seat & iso digraph have been
> > reinvented at turtle bay when breakaway seats &
> > digraphs have been created
> >
> > & i think we have only been using united nations
> > membership as the defining characteristic of the
> world
> > class because that is the global consensus view of
> it
> > while allowing for or perhaps rather ignoring the
> > inconvenient exceptions of taiwan & vatican city
> >
> > if there were a better way to acknowledge the
> > tripointing hierarchy
> > & to rightly recognize the world class or top
> level of
> > it
> > i think we should find & use it
> >
> > --- "Lowell G. McManus" <lgm@...> wrote:
> >
> >> Putin can decry "separatist territorial
> pretenses"
> >> all he wishes (as
> >> well he probably should from his point of view),
> but
> >> the independence of
> >> Montenegro is hardly a pretense. Under the 2003
> >> Constitutional Charter
> >> of Serbia and Montenegro, either of the two
> >> republics was entitled to
> >> hold a referendum on separation after three
> years.
> >> What Montenegro is
> >> doing is strictly by-the-book.
> >>
> >> As for the race to Turtle Bay: As the
> Montenegrins
> >> divorce the
> >> Serbians, each party becomes as single as the
> other.
> >> Will Serbia be
> >> allowed to inherit the existing S&M seat while
> >> Montenegro has to apply
> >> anew, or will both Serbia and Montenegro need to
> be
> >> admitted anew?
> >> Please remember that it took the UN from 1992 to
> >> 2000 to admit the rump
> >> Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (renamed Serbia
> and
> >> Montenegro in 2003)
> >> in lieu of the former Socialist Federative
> Republic
> >> of Yugoslavia after
> >> Slovenia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia, and
> Macedonia
> >> had departed.
> >>
> >> Lowell G. McManus
> >> Leesville, Louisiana, USA
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "aletheiak" <aletheiak@...>
> >> To: <BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com>
> >> Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 9:42 AM
> >> Subject: [BoundaryPoint] Re: breakaway montenegro
> >> tripoints are looking
> >> like the winners
> >>
> >>
> >> > but the race to turtle bay cant actually be won
> >> until the general
> >> > assembly reconvenes in
> >> > the fall
> >> >
> >> > & tho no other contenders have emerged from the
> >> pack or seem at all
> >> > likely to do so at
> >> > this point
> >> > yet there are complications ahead
> >> >
> >> > for example
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
> >> >=== message truncated ===
> >> >
> >> > still i would give even money now
> >> > on either the montenegro prospects or all the
> >> others combined
> >> > to win
> >> >
> >> > as opposed to placing or showing
> >> >
> >> > or finishing at all
> >> >
> >> > --- In BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com, aletheia
> >> kallos <aletheiak@...>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> margin of victory if any is razor thin tho
> >> >> in race to turtle bay
> >> >> & official result of photo finish wont be
> known
> >> til
> >> >> morning
>