Subject: seoul floats expansive new jpkpkr position<br/>
Date: Jun 05, 2006 @ 15:49<br/>
Author: aletheia kallos (aletheia kallos &lt;aletheiak@...&gt;)<br/>
Prev&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Next<br/>
<a href="19577.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="19579.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-75963001"><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://times.hankooki.com/lpage/200606/kt2006060517254810160.htm">http://times.hankooki.com/lpage/200606/kt2006060517254810160.htm</a><br/>
<br/>
& i can understand how there could be a blue & a red &<br/>
a green line in the above map<br/>
& that they would diverge from point 35 in the map<br/>
linked here below<br/>
but <br/>
even in disagreement they should still eventually<br/>
reconverge at a hypothetical & relatively more<br/>
objective jpkpkr tripoint to the north<br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.law.fsu.edu/library/collection/LimitsinSeas/maps/ls75dc.html">http://www.law.fsu.edu/library/collection/LimitsinSeas/maps/ls75dc.html</a><br/>
<br/>
this anomaly or journalistic oversimplification in the<br/>
korea times map however is understandable in that the<br/>
jpkp & kpkr eez borders are themselves still only<br/>
hypothetical equidistance lines<br/>
<br/>
& this new jpkpkr baby is obviously just show biz &<br/>
going nowhere fast anyway<br/>
<br/>
__________________________________________________<br/>
Do You Yahoo!?<br/>
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around <br/>
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://mail.yahoo.com">http://mail.yahoo.com</a></div>