Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Tripoint picture: BZGTMX<br/>
Date: Jan 16, 2006 @ 00:55<br/>
Author: Lowell G. McManus (&quot;Lowell G. McManus&quot; &lt;lgm@...&gt;)<br/>
<a href="19195.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Topic&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="19197.htm">Next</a>&emsp;[<a href="topic19185.htm">All</a> Posts]<br/>
<a href="19195.htm">Prev</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Post in Time&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="19197.htm">Next</a><br/>
<br/><br/>
<div id="ygrps-yiv-1943787057">I just Googled &quot;Comisión Internacional de Límites y Aguas <br/>
México-Guatemala-Belice&quot; and got 138 hits.<br/>
<br/>
I don&#39;t have time to check them out, but the commission is not as obscure as one <br/>
might think.<br/>
<br/>
Lowell G. McManus<br/>
Leesville, Louisiana, USA<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<blockquote><span title="qreply"> ----- Original Message ----- <br/>
From: &quot;aletheia kallos&quot; &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:aletheiak@...">aletheiak@...</a>&gt;<br/>
To: &lt;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="mailto:BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com">BoundaryPoint@yahoogroups.com</a>&gt;<br/>
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 5:37 PM<br/>
Subject: Re: [BoundaryPoint] Tripoint picture: BZGTMX<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
&gt; doug<br/>
&gt; another reason this bzgtmx commission pdf you bring is<br/>
&gt; a remarkable document<br/>
&gt; even if it doesnt mention a bzgtmx tripoint<br/>
&gt; let alone the truest available bzgtmx tripoint<br/>
&gt; position<br/>
&gt; is the fact that the commission is even tripartite at<br/>
&gt; all<br/>
&gt; for this is indeed the first word we have of this<br/>
&gt; commission as well as its only known work<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; & til guatemala rejoins the bzgt renovation process<br/>
&gt; this unilateral mexican documentation of gtmx is the<br/>
&gt; only sign of cooperation & reintegration toward the<br/>
&gt; fully shared goal of a real & fully legal bzgtmx<br/>
&gt; tripoint<br/>
&gt; as well as toward the separate bipartite goals of<br/>
&gt; fully normal bzgt & bzmx borders<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; for gtmx up to marker 107 doesnt have any such problem<br/>
&gt; & didnt need belize for this pdf<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; so i guess this commission began by bringing gtmx<br/>
&gt; forward & really up to the state of the art as well as<br/>
&gt; they could in 2003 in hopes that not only the bzgtmx<br/>
&gt; tripoint but also both of its other 2 convergent<br/>
&gt; segments would be upgraded sequentially<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; but in fact this whole commission may have been more<br/>
&gt; wishful thinking than anything else<br/>
&gt; beyond what it tangibly did<br/>
&gt; & most wishful of all on the part of mexico so she<br/>
&gt; could get started already with a bzmx demarcation<br/>
&gt; that would gain her this 200 meter strip about 20 km<br/>
&gt; long from bzgtmx to the rio azul<br/>
&gt;<br/>
&gt; & the fact that we dont see a 2004 or 2005 sequel pdf<br/>
&gt; regarding these other 2 borders<br/>
&gt; nor anything at all new regarding them anywhere<br/>
&gt; suggests to me that work remains stalled on them<br/>
&gt; pending the final outcome of bzgtmx<br/>
&gt; & the reentry of gt into the bzgt renovation<br/>
&gt; since the new tripoint position about 200 meters to<br/>
&gt; the east of gtmx marker 107 is in all likelihood going<br/>
&gt; to be the terminal point for bzmx<br/>
&gt; just as it is already fully expected to be the<br/>
&gt; terminal point for the already fully marked but not<br/>
&gt; yet fully legal bzgt </span></blockquote></div>